Bounty Competitions vs Omaze UK — where does your tenner work harder?

Bounty Competitions takes it for regular players on price and overall score — 8.2 overall with a 7.8 value beats Omaze UK’s 7.7 overall and 5.2 value. Omaze UK still wins if you’re chasing life‑changing houses and care about transparency and charity — 9.2 variety, 8.5 transparency, and £1,000,000 guaranteed to each partner charity per cycle.

Your tenner: price and value

If you want stretch from a quid, Bounty is your shop. Tickets run £0.20–£9.99, and that shows in the numbers: value 7.8. Omaze sits at £10–£150 per entry (subs from £10/month) and scores 5.2 for value — dearer by design, with uncapped entry pools and unknown odds flagged in their cons.

Winner: Bounty Competitions for everyday value.

Prizes and pace

Omaze is built for the big dream: grand houses, Early Bird add‑ons, a £1,000 Weekly Cash Draw posted Fridays 5pm, and a Monthly Millionaire every month. That breadth lands a 9.2 for variety. Bounty is no slouch at 9.0 — cars, tech, the odd house — but its calling card is frequency: draws held within 72 hours of closing, frequent daily cash (e.g. £10k daily) and ‘Super Saturday’ weekends, plus instant wins.

Winners: Omaze for headline variety; Bounty for speed and instant‑win action.

How they draw: transparency and odds

Omaze uses a verifiably random computer draw with independent scrutineer Civica Election Services, and posts results clearly — transparency 8.5. Bounty draws live on Facebook using Google RNG or a random ball machine with entry lists — transparency 7.2. On odds, both can run long: Omaze’s uncapped entries mean you can’t size the field; Bounty’s big pots can hit 75,000 tickets on a £10k, per their cons.

Winner: Omaze UK for draw transparency and audit trail.

Service, site and app

Service is stronger at Bounty: 8.7 vs Omaze’s 7.6. Site scores are level at 8.2 each. App‑wise, Omaze offers iOS and Android; Bounty has iOS, Android unconfirmed. Omaze’s cons mention some complaints about subscription management and site UX; Bounty’s community presence is called strong in their verdict.

Winners: Bounty for service; app access to Omaze if you’re on Android.

Paying in and the free post

Omaze takes debit/credit cards and PayPal for one‑off entries, plus in‑app payments; Bounty accepts debit cards, limited credit up to £250/month (not for instant wins), and has an on‑site wallet. Both offer a free postal route. Omaze’s is called clear; Bounty’s has strict account and timing rules, and draws can be brought forward after the initial four‑day postal period — all in their cons.

Winner: Draw on payments, with an edge to Omaze for simpler free‑post terms.

The charity factor

This is Omaze’s trump card. They guarantee £1,000,000 to each partner charity per cycle and position themselves as the charity‑first giant. Bounty’s pitch is value and frequency as a big Scottish name. Different missions.

Trust Index: 50 apiece.

Split verdict

• Pick Bounty Competitions if you’re a regular punter chasing low‑cost daily cash and strong service — 7.8 value, 8.7 service, instant wins, frequent £10k daily draws.
• Pick Omaze UK if you’re a charity‑minded house‑dreamer who wants polished draws and clear transparency — 9.2 variety, 8.5 transparency, £1,000,000 guaranteed to each partner charity per cycle.